Skip to content

Thresholds

Each criterion is defined with one or more upper and/or lower threshold values. Scenarios with reported values outside the range are marker with the respective evaluation outcome.

The possible evaluation outcomes depend on the criterion type. Feasibility and sustainability concerns mark scenarios as either ok, medium or high, whereas historical vetting mark scenarios as ok or failed.

Scenarios that do not report all variables that are part of the vetting are marked as insufficient reporting. Feasibility and sustainability concerns where the relevant variable is not reported by the scenario are marked as not assigned.

Some thresholds are defined in relation to some reference, as set by the reference data column. The reference data is defined separately. The values defined as thresholds therefore have to be multiplied with the values from the reference data before applying the criteria to scenario data.

Historical Vetting

CRITERION VARIABLE REGION YEAR REFERENCE DATA UNIT EVALUATION OUTCOME LOWER UPPER
Historical Vetting|Emissions|CO2|Energy and Industrial Processes Emissions|CO2|Energy and Industrial Processes World 2010, 2015 CEDS-2025 dimensionless failed 0.8 1.2
Historical Vetting|Emissions|CO2|Energy and Industrial Processes Emissions|CO2|Energy and Industrial Processes World 2020 range(CEDS-2025,CEDS-2025-COVIDaveraged) dimensionless failed 0.8 1.2
Historical Vetting|Emissions|CO2|Energy and Industrial Processes Emissions|CO2|Energy and Industrial Processes World 2025 CEDS-2025-extrapol25 dimensionless failed 0.8 1.2
Historical Vetting|Primary Energy|Coal Primary Energy|Coal World 2010, 2015 IEA-ESDB-20250610 dimensionless failed 0.8 1.2
Historical Vetting|Primary Energy|Coal Primary Energy|Coal World 2020 range(IEA-ESDB-20250610,IEA-ESDB-20250610-COVIDaveraged) dimensionless failed 0.8 1.2
Historical Vetting|Primary Energy|Coal Primary Energy|Coal World 2025 IEA-ESDB-20250610-extrapol25 dimensionless failed 0.8 1.2
Historical Vetting|Primary Energy|Gas Primary Energy|Gas World 2010, 2015 IEA-ESDB-20250610 dimensionless failed 0.8 1.2
Historical Vetting|Primary Energy|Gas Primary Energy|Gas World 2020 range(IEA-ESDB-20250610,IEA-ESDB-20250610-COVIDaveraged) dimensionless failed 0.8 1.2
Historical Vetting|Primary Energy|Gas Primary Energy|Gas World 2025 IEA-ESDB-20250610-extrapol25 dimensionless failed 0.8 1.2
Historical Vetting|Primary Energy|Oil Primary Energy|Oil World 2010, 2015 IEA-ESDB-20250610 dimensionless failed 0.8 1.2
Historical Vetting|Primary Energy|Oil Primary Energy|Oil World 2020 range(IEA-ESDB-20250610,IEA-ESDB-20250610-COVIDaveraged) dimensionless failed 0.8 1.2
Historical Vetting|Primary Energy|Oil Primary Energy|Oil World 2025 IEA-ESDB-20250610-extrapol25 dimensionless failed 0.8 1.2
Historical Vetting|Primary Energy|Nuclear Primary Energy|Nuclear World 2010, 2015 IEA-ESDB-20250610 dimensionless failed 0.8 1.2
Historical Vetting|Primary Energy|Nuclear Primary Energy|Nuclear World 2020 range(IEA-ESDB-20250610,IEA-ESDB-20250610-COVIDaveraged) dimensionless failed 0.8 1.2
Historical Vetting|Primary Energy|Nuclear Primary Energy|Nuclear World 2025 IEA-ESDB-20250610-extrapol25 dimensionless failed 0.8 1.2
Historical Vetting|Final Energy Final Energy World 2010, 2015 IEA-ESDB-20250610 dimensionless failed 0.8 1.2
Historical Vetting|Final Energy Final Energy World 2020 range(IEA-ESDB-20250610,IEA-ESDB-20250610-COVIDaveraged) dimensionless failed 0.8 1.2
Historical Vetting|Final Energy Final Energy World 2025 IEA-ESDB-20250610-extrapol25 dimensionless failed 0.8 1.2

Feasibility Concern

CRITERION VARIABLE REGION YEAR REFERENCE DATA UNIT EVALUATION OUTCOME LOWER UPPER
Feasibility Concern|Hydropower Capacity Capacity|Electricity|Hydro World 2030 GW medium 1175.37 1606.66
Feasibility Concern|Hydropower Capacity Capacity|Electricity|Hydro World 2030 GW high 979.43 2117.58
Feasibility Concern|Nuclear Capacity Capacity|Electricity|Nuclear World 2030 GW medium 320.33 441.92
Feasibility Concern|Nuclear Capacity Capacity|Electricity|Nuclear World 2030 GW high 0 507.1
Feasibility Concern|Carbon Capture and Storage Carbon Capture|Geological Storage, Carbon Capture World 2030 Mt CO2/yr medium 44.02 152.47
Feasibility Concern|Carbon Capture and Storage Carbon Capture|Geological Storage, Carbon Capture World 2030 Mt CO2/yr high 0 457.89
Feasibility Concern|Carbon Capture and Storage Carbon Capture|Geological Storage, Carbon Capture World 2035 Mt CO2/yr medium 1300
Feasibility Concern|Carbon Capture and Storage Carbon Capture|Geological Storage, Carbon Capture World 2040 Mt CO2/yr medium 4300
Feasibility Concern|Solar PV Capacity Capacity|Electricity|Solar World 2030 GW medium 4350.2 8163.7
Feasibility Concern|Solar PV Capacity Capacity|Electricity|Solar World 2030 GW high 2683.2 10896
Feasibility Concern|Onshore Wind Capacity Capacity|Electricity|Wind|Onshore World 2030 GW medium 1719 2853
Feasibility Concern|Onshore Wind Capacity Capacity|Electricity|Wind|Onshore World 2030 GW high 1220 3655
Feasibility Concern|Wind Capacity Capacity|Electricity|Wind World 2030 GW medium 1719
Feasibility Concern|Wind Capacity Capacity|Electricity|Wind World 2030 GW high 1220

Sustainability Concern

CRITERION VARIABLE REGION YEAR REFERENCE DATA UNIT EVALUATION OUTCOME LOWER UPPER
Sustainability Concern|Food Availability Food Availability [per capita] World kcal/cap/day medium 2100 5000
Sustainability Concern|Unsustainable Bioenergy Use Primary Energy|Biomass World EJ/yr medium 100
Sustainability Concern|Unsustainable Bioenergy Use Primary Energy|Biomass World EJ/yr high 245
Sustainability Concern|Exceeding Prudent Limit For Geological Carbon Storage Carbon Capture|Geological Storage World cumulative[2020-2100] Gt CO2 high 1460
Sustainability Concern|Exceeding Prudent Limit For Geological Carbon Storage Carbon Capture|Geological Storage World cumulative[2020-2100] Gt CO2 medium 1290